The Soil Health Institute Announces its Virtual 2021 Annual Meeting: “Enriching Soil, Enhancing Life”

FOR INFORMATION:
Byron Rath +1-919-230-0343
brath@soilhealthinstitute.org

Research Triangle Park, NC, June 9, 2021 – The Soil Health Institute (SHI), the non-profit charged with safeguarding and enhancing the vitality and productivity of soils, announced today its much-anticipated annual meeting will be held on August 11 and 12, 2021. This year’s theme is “Enriching Soil, Enhancing Life” and the event will be hosted virtually.

“Enriching Soil, Enhancing Life” is designed to connect and advance the science, adoption, and environmental benefits of soil health. A wide array of practical information, research, and actionable takeaways will be presented that is relevant to farmers, agribusiness, consultants, scientists, field conservationists, government, and non-governmental organization professionals around the world.

The two-day event will feature six plenary sessions:

  • Farmers’ Experiences with Adopting Soil Health Systems
  • Business Case for Regenerative Soil Health Systems
  • Agricultural Input Impacts on Soil Health
  • Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation through Soil Health
  • Establishing Soil Health Interpretations for Farmers and Conservation Planners
  • Understanding and Managing the Soil Microbiome

Each day, sessions will run from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. ET, break for an hour, then resume from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET.

“We’re at a critical juncture in the fight against climate change,” said Dr. Wayne Honeycutt, CEO of the Soil Health Institute. “Our organization hosts this event to connect more people to the most recent science behind soil health to empower implementation of practices and soil health systems that not only benefit farmers’ livelihoods but can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, nutrient runoff, and provide many other environmental benefits worldwide.”

ABOUT SOIL HEALTH INSTITUTE

The Soil Health Institute is a global non-profit with a mission to safeguard and enhance the vitality and productivity of soil through scientific research and advancement. We bring together leaders in soil health science and the industry to help farmers, ranchers, and landowners adopt soil health systems that build drought resilience, stabilize yield, and benefit their bottom line. The Institute’s team of scientists, holding doctorates in various soil science and related disciplines, has developed highly effective soil health targets and standardized measurements to quantify progress at achieving regenerative and sustainable agricultural systems, and leads the cutting-edge fields of carbon sequestration and decoding the soil microbiome. Healthy soils are the foundation for rejuvenating our land. Together, we can create a secure future for all, mitigate the effects of climate change, and help agriculture and organizations meet production and environmental goals at scale. Visit soilhealthinstitute.org to learn more and follow us on LinkedInTwitter, and Facebook.


CEPHaS Conservation Agriculture Perspectives – 4

CEPHaS is interested in a broad perspective on conservation agriculture, in the context of the farming system, the constraints farmers face and the ways in which they are adapting to climate change. For this reason we have engaged with a range of partners, and in this series we invite them to respond to some questions.

The Indaba Agricultural Policy Research Institute (IAPRI) is a private company in Zambia with a board of directors drawn from stakeholders across the public and private sector. Its principal mandate is to conduct research in agricultural policy and to undertake outreach activities, supporting the agricultural sector in Zambia and pursuing agricultural development which is sustainable and pro-poor. More information can be found at their website https:// www.iapri.org.zm/ 

Dr Hambulo Ngoma (pictured above) answers our questions.

CEPHaS 4

Conservation Agriculture Perspectives

1. What are the main ways in which you have seen smallholder farmers adapting to climate change in southern and central Africa in recent years?

Farmers in Southern Africa adapt to climate change mainly through staggered planting, planting early maturing and drought-tolerant varieties, and the adoption of conservation agriculture practices. Farmers have diversified their livelihoods by venturing into non-farm enterprises like trading. More about farmer responses to climate change in Zambia has been published by Mulenga et al. (2017). Climate Trends and Farmers’ Perceptions of Climate Change in Zambia. Environmental Management 59, 291–306.

2. In what sets of circumstances (biophysical, socio-economic etc) are conservation agriculture practices most likely to be beneficial to rural communities, and in what circumstances are they least likely to be useful?

Biophysical
CA would be most likely to be beneficial under semi-dry conditions with low rainfall, I am not sure that it would be beneficial in under very dry and wet conditions.
Socio-economic
CA is most beneficial for those with finance to hire in labour and, more importantly, to afford herbicides and to finance other CA activities. Secure tenure might help the uptake of CA and make it more feasible to retain crop residues.

3. What components of conservation agriculture systems are most problematic from the perspective of farmers? 

Making planting basins under minimum tillage with hand hoes is challenging for farmers because of the drudgery, as is weeding, where they do not have access to herbicides. Retaining residues is difficult given competing uses, and on communal open grazing land. Limited market access for legumes makes full rotation an issue for some farmers.

4. What do you think are the main research questions that need to be addressed to support food security in sub-Saharan Africa under climate change?

An overarching area of interest is to understand how best smallholder farming systems can best become resilient to climate change while meeting a rising demand for food. A top priority should be to identify instruments to enhance resilience, and to test these out. It would also be interesting to understand how markets can enhance food security and help support the uptake of CA amidst climate change.

Biography of Dr Hambulo Ngoma (pictured overleaf)

Dr Hambulo Ngoma was a research fellow at IAPRI and lead, climate change and natural resource management thematic area at the time of this interview. He is now Agricultural Economist, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Southern Africa Regional Office in Harare, Zimbabwe.

Dr Hambulo Ngoma is a Development Economist with research interests spanning the development-environment nexus. His current research applies various methods to understand the connections among land use, agricultural practices, and livelihoods of smallholder farmers in the context of climate change in Southern Africa. He is particularly interested in factors influencing the adoption of new technologies and the impacts of these practices on livelihoods and welfare of smallholder farmers.

To find out more, visit our web pages at www2.bgs.ac.uk/CEPHaS and follow us on twitter @CEPHaS_Soil


CEPhaS Conservation Agriculture Perspectives – 5

CEPHaS 5

Conservation Agriculture Perspectives

Professor Emanoel Gomes de Moura is professor in the Agroecology Post- Graduate programme at Maranhão State University in Brazil. He is a specialist in tropical agriculture with particular interest in low-fertility soils and the stabilization of soil organic carbon. Alana das Chagas Ferreira Aguiar is also a professor at Maranhão State University where she works on ecological intensification and nutrient cycling, working with family farmers. They have both been collaborating with Professor Sacha Mooney (University of Nottingham, and CEPHaS project) to examine and demonstrate the benefits for soil quality and crop production of systems which combine grazing livestock, trees and crops as an adaptation to climate change. Here they tell us more about the systems they are studying, an interesting contrast with the conservation agriculture methods which CEPHaS is examining in Africa, but with some common features.

1. What are the main ways in which you have seen farmers adapting to climate change in Brazil in recent years?

  • The principal strategy used by large-scale farmers to adapt to climate change in Brazil is the integrated agri-silvo-pastoral system also named low- carbon agriculture. This system comprises planting eucalyptus rows at wide spacings between crop strips intercropped with grass. This increases organic inputs to the soil, building the soil carbon stock and with it soil fertility and structural stability.
  • At the family farm scale, we have recommended an integrated-alley-crop- livestock-system. This system takes advantage of fast-growing leguminous tropical trees which produce high quality biomass which is used to increase and maintain soil organic matter in soil. Zero till is almost always used, although farmers sometimes abandon it because of problems with weed control. Maize — Soybean rotations are used, mainly to reduce root diseases.

2.  In what sets of circumstances (biophysical, socio-economic etc) are conservation agriculture practices most likely to be beneficial to rural communities, and in what circumstances are they least likely to be useful?

Conservation agriculture practices are most likely to be beneficial to rural communities when family farmers have at their disposal, technologies, and systems to replace unsustainable models like shifting cultivation systems where land is brought into cultivation, and then abandoned to fallow after a few years. Establishing alternative and sustainable agricultural system

is heavily dependent on support of public decision makers and local government. Conservation agriculture practices fail in rural communities when they are not adequately supported through education and local technicians/agronomists.

3. What components of conservation agriculture systems are most problematic from the perspective of farmers?

We have found that many smallholder farmers in the Amazonian periphery view the greater complexity of the systems from conservation agriculture, like integrated-crop-livestock-systems, as a significant barrier to adoption. This highlights the need to improve how technicians and researchers engage with farmers. The substitution of simple low-cost systems like slash and burn with more complex and expensive ones such as no-tillage in alley cropping cannot succeed without efficient support by public agencies to overcome principal bottlenecks. Training in soil-crop management practices and increased understanding of the functioning of systems and their components, fertilizers, and soil amendments are needed urgently.

In addition to improving the dissemination of technology, efficient strategies to add value to the harvested product and to reduce the impact of costs of inputs on farmers’ evaluation of the system are needed.

4. What do you think should be priority research topics if agriculture in Brazil is to adapt to climate change and contribute to mitigation?

In tropical regions, climatic factors promote the loss of soil organic matter through fast decomposition, and the loss of fertility through leaching of nutrients. Unless this is countered by soil management, land degradation (and consequently shifting

cultivation) will occur. The continuous management of soil in the humid tropics requires soil organic matter accumulation and stabilization, increased retention of base cations in the root zone, and improvements to the soil structure. This requires approaches which do more than promote crop productivity in any one season, but which increase the stabilization of soil organic matter, and improve the cycling of nutrients to maintain fertility. The alley cropping system using leguminous trees that we have been using is one such option, but we need future research to consider others.

Integrated agri-silvo-pastoral system in an extensive farm in the Amazonian periphery.

To find out more, visit our webpages at www2.bgs.ac.uk/CEPHaS and follow us on twitter @CEPHaS_Soil


Unlocking Connectivity in Agricultural Supply Chains – Carolyn Baltz

SHI collaborates with The Sustainability Consortium (TSC) to drive action and innovation in sustainable practices. SHI invited Ms. Carolyn Baltz, the Senior Manager of Membership and Development at TSC, to address the 3rd Annual Meeting and provide a summary of activities.

TSC is a global, non-profit organization administered by Arizona State University and the University of Arkansas. TSC’s mission is to use the best sustainability science to help companies make everyday products better and more sustainable.

The organization enables members to actively participate in multi-stakeholder, science-based, business toolkit development and industry solutions through a pre-competitive approach. More than 100 organizations and 2,000 users contribute to the development and implementation of TSC materials.

According to Ms. Baltz, stakeholders work diligently to create category sustainability profiles that contain relevant information on hotspots, sustainability issues, opportunities for improvement, and key performance indicators. Ms. Baltz shared how these elements are used to develop customized tool kits for member businesses to execute sustainability practices within their organizations.


Turning Soil Health into $oil Wealth: Policy and Economics – Jim Jordahl

Dr. Jim Jordahl evaluates monetizing soil health from a land valuation perspective. Dr. Jordahl has more than 30 years of experience in farming operations, soil science, engineering, environmental science, and project management. Dr. Jordahl currently works with the Iowa Agriculture Water Alliance to increase the pace and scale of farmer-led efforts to improve water quality.

Dr. Jordahl said the date for a widely-accepted soil health metric is rapidly approaching. When that metric is accepted, a number of economic incentives will become apparent in the agricultural real estate marketplace. A metric on soil health that properly indicates increased agricultural productivity of a piece of property could encourage landowners to adopt and/or pressure property managers into adopting better soil health practices.


Microbial Physiology Regulates How Much Crop Residue Becomes Soil Organic Matter – Stuart Grandy

Dr. Stuart Grandy, Associate Professor at the University of New Hampshire, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, pressed the audience to consider how the science behind soil health should progress and innovate.

Dr. Grandy described the process of how microbial cells promote biomass creation over time. He shared insight on how specific microbes are being studied and how differences in inputs figure into biomass creation. Dr. Grandy also explained results of cover crop studies.


Lessons Learned from 30 Years of SARE Farmer-Researcher Projects – Rob Myers

Dr. Rob Myers discussed farmer, rancher, and researcher interaction through the lens of grants and projects funded by Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE) programming during the last 30 years. Dr. Myers is the Regional Director of Extension Programs for the USDA-NIFA North Central Region, SARE.

Dr. Myers stressed the importance of integrating early and continuous input from farmers and ranchers on potential research projects. He also outlined methods and materials SARE uses for recruiting potential research partners.