All posts by admin

Managing for Soil Organic Carbon is fundamental to Regenerative Agriculture

In a recent webinar, the Soil Health Institute’s President and CEO, Dr. Wayne Honeycutt, provided an introduction on how farmers can manage their soils to increase soil organic carbon. He laid out the facts with four essential questions:

    1. What is soil organic carbon?
    2. How does it benefit farming?
    3. How can you increase soil organic carbon?
    4. How long does it take?

Read on to learn more about retaining organic carbon in your soil and the benefits it brings to your farm.

What is soil organic carbon?

Let’s start with soil organic matter, which consists of elements like carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus. It starts as materials from plants and animals that are then further transformed during the decomposition process by microorganisms. Soil organic matter and soil organic carbon are often used interchangeably as organic matter is about half carbon. However, different methods are used to measure them. Put simply, soil organic carbon is the carbon in soil organic matter.

How does it benefit farming? 

Here are the seven most important benefits of soil organic carbon:

    1. Increased water holding capacity in soils. This builds drought resilience.
    1. Lower soil density. As you increase carbon, density decreases because organic compounds are less dense than the soil minerals. When soil is less dense, the roots can travel through the soil and scavenge for nutrients and water more easily. This makes for a healthier plant overall.
    1. Increased water infiltration. Organic carbon helps to form soil aggregates, where organic molecules produced by microorganisms bind mineral particles together. The no-till process helps to preserve these aggregates, increasing carbon in surface soils, which allows more aggregates to form, further stabilizing the soil structure. Tilled fields typically have less carbon and poorer water infiltration – this is evident of ponded water on fields after heavy rainfall.
    1. Increased nutrient availability. When microbes feed on soil organic carbon (in order to get energy), they release nitrogen and phosphorus that were tied to that carbon, thereby providing more nutrients for the plant.
    1. Improved trafficability, meaning that the soil structure is improved and allows farming equipment to traverse the field more days in a given year.
    1. Increased yield stability. Although there is not a lot of experimental data on this, many farmers have found this benefit to be true. When compared to their neighbors, who do not use soil health practices that increase carbon, farmers that do find they have more stable yields from year-to-year. This is often most evident during drought years, likely because of the greater water-holding capacity, reduced density and other benefits that increasing soil organic carbon has for farmers.
    1. Finally, soil organic carbon increases profitability. Soil Health Institute (SHI) scientists recently interviewed 125 farmers about their profitability since they started using soil health systems. While the Institute will be releasing those results in the coming months, Dr. Honeycutt said that almost all of the farmers interviewed reported higher profitability after adopting soil health systems that increase soil organic carbon.

How can you increase soil organic carbon? 

As SHI’s soil scientists have proven, the benefits of soil organic carbon are numerous. However, the question remains for how farmers can increase the amount of carbon in their soil.

One of the first things to think about is the carbon cycle at a fundamental level. It’s important to note that carbon is always coming in and out of the soil. The amount of soil organic carbon is the net balance of how much organic carbon is put into the soil mostly from plants, such as dead leaves, roots, and compounds released by living roots, and how much organic carbon is removed by harvest or returned to the atmosphere as carbon dioxide by microbial processes.

Therefore, the goal is to add more carbon in the soil than you lose to the air or remove through harvest.

So, how do you achieve that? According to Dr. Honeycutt, this is done through the management choices that alter the carbon balance.

It is much easier to lose soil organic carbon than it is to gain it. Research shows that continuous no-till builds soil organic carbon in surface soils over time. In the United States, many of our cropland soils have lost 40-50% of their precious soil organic carbon. Much of this has been through tillage. No-tillage results in more organic carbon accumulation in the surface soil and therefore results in the on-farm benefits described above.

The use of cover crops is also a great opportunity for incorporating more carbon to your soil. Cover crops also protect the soil from erosion and help recycle nutrients from deeper in the soil back to the surface. Their residue provides a mulch to keep the soil cool and moist, and as that residue decomposes, some ends up as soil organic carbon.

Other important management decisions also affect carbon in your soil. For example, choice of crop rotation and residue management can dramatically affect the amount carbon that is added to your soil.

Additionally, farmers who integrate livestock in their operation have a wonderful opportunity to increase carbon in their soils through the direct application of animal manure while livestock graze cover crops or crop residue for forage.

How long does it take? 

The golden question: When can you expect to see results? As Dr. Honeycutt says, you’re not going to like his answer.

The answer: It all depends.

It can usually take about three to five years after changing management before you can have a measurable change in your soil due to background variability, including weather and soil type. Of course, this doesn’t mean that you aren’t having change before that. In general, it takes a bit longer to show a measurable increase in soil organic carbon in hot or dry climates and in very sandy soils. Landscape positions can also influence those results. For example, a lower landscape position may retain more water, allowing plants to grow better and therefore return more carbon to the soil. Those same moist conditions can also slow decomposition processes, resulting in greater carbon build-up in those landscape position soils.

Dr. Honeycutt’s best advice is to focus on the management choices that you make and keep a positive outlook.

“If you think you can, you can. If you think you can’t, you're right.”

Final thoughts

Properly managing the soil organic carbon content is fundamental to regenerative agriculture. It can provide many benefits to farmers who are committed to implementing soil health systems. You want to think of yourself as a carbon manager and ask how you can increase the amount of carbon in soil to improve soil health and provide benefits for you and your farm.

Please use the following resources for more information and to answer  questions you may have:

What are the four steps to healthier soils?

The Soil Health Institute (SHI) along with other scientific bodies, advocates four basic soil health principles that apply to all agricultural systems in one way or another.  To maximize benefits through accelerated soil health improvements, they need to be implemented as a system.  This creates a synergistic effect where the sum is greater than the individual parts.

In order to shift the needle, farmers need to look at soils differently.  The definition below of soil health helps producers’ home in on what they need to do to accomplish this:

“Soil Health is the continued capacity of soil to function as a vital living ecosystem that sustains plants, animals, and humans.”

This definition speaks to creating a management system that is sustainable and considers the soil microbes as a key component of the system that drives soil functions necessary for food and fiber production.

Farmers need to understand the role that soils play in agricultural production systems. The functions necessary to be successful are nutrient cycling, regulating water (infiltration and availability), filtering and buffering pollutants, physical stability to support agricultural activities (they must get across the field), and creating habitat for soil organisms beneficial for food and fiber production.  All of these functions are impacted or mediated by soil microbes.  Here at SHI, we like to think of farmers that they are habitat managers for soil microbes.

The four soil health principles are:

    1. Minimize soil disturbance – soil disturbance is any activity that impacts or destroys habitat for soil microbes.  It can be broken into three categories: physical disturbance (tillage destroys the house microbes live in); chemical disturbance that impacts non-targeted organisms disrupting the soil food web, making them less resilient; and biological disturbance which includes the lack of diversity in crop rotations or overgrazing in grazing systems.
    2. Maximizing diversity – helps to create a balanced habitat for soil organisms, breaks pest and disease cycles, and provides diverse biomass both above and below ground that can be converted into soil organic matter. Diversity can be added by lengthening the crop rotation or adding perennials, planting cover crops after harvest, and incorporate livestock grazing through a strategy that ensures even distribution of manure while preventing overgrazing.
    3. Keep continuous living roots growing as much as possible – modern agricultural systems only capture solar energy for a portion of the year (100-120 days), while sunlight hits the earth year-round.  Incorporating cover crops allows for plants to turn sunlight into food for soil microbes in the portions of the year commodity crops are not being grown.  Plants feed soil microbes through exudates, hence the more exudates, the larger the microbial community that can be supported. In some parts of the country this can be done almost year-round, other parts not so much, but they still can provide benefits.
    4. Maintain residue cover as long as possible – residue cover controls erosion while protecting soil aggregates that are so important for water infiltration.  Cover also keeps the soil cool during the heat of the summer.  Bare soil temperatures can exceed 100 °F at a depth of 1” to 2”, which creates a hostile environment for soil microbes, residue cover can keep soil temperatures 15-20 °F cooler.  This reduces evaporation while creating a favorable habitat.

There are basically five or six conservation practices or activities that farmers can leverage to develop a soil health management system.  These include:

    1. Conservation Tillage – preferably no-till, but some crops require tillage to harvest, limiting the depth and area tillage is done can be useful
    2. Cover Crops – can be used to add diversity to a crop rotation with one or two commodity crops, e.g. corn-soybean, cotton-cotton-peanuts.  They need to be selected with a purpose, a cover crop should benefit the crop that will follow it.  Cover crops should be planted as a mix, multi-species mixes promote more diversity.
    3. Conservation crop rotation – rotation need to move away from monocultures or continuous commodity production, e.g. continuous corn or cotton
    4. Nutrient management – a nutrient management plan should be developed that considers the biological nutrient cycles occurring in the soil
    5. Pest management – pest management strategies need to consider beneficial organisms and how they will be affected

The science has proven that a well-executed soil health management system is key to a more sustainable future for agriculture and the planet.  The benefits are numerous and the on-farm economics in the long-term make it a viable practice to pursue:

    1. Soil health systems build in resiliency against extreme weather events and droughts, reducing soil erosion and nutrient run-off in flooding and maintaining soil water during extended dry spells.
    2. This resiliency smooths out volatility with yields, allowing for more consistent and predictable results.
    3. Input costs such as irrigation, fertilizers, and pesticides are reduced through the adoption of soil health practices that can positively impact margins and therefore profits.
    4. Sequestering more organic carbon in the soil means that crops and the soil biome can thrive. Less CO2 is also released into the atmosphere and helps mitigate climate change.

We can’t over emphasis the importance to develop and implement a soil health management system and the benefits it brings.  While improvements can be made by introducing one activity at a time, to truly see changes requires a synergistic approach.  It may take three to five years for a producer to notice a measurable benefit through adopting soil health management systems, but the proven results should convince a producer to stay with implementing the system.

Soilborne plant pathogen fact sheet

Some soilborne pathogens can have a devastating effect on the economic viability of crops. Thankfully, soil health systems have been shown to help suppress plant pathogens. Below are some facts about soilborne pathogens and how soil conditions affect them.

    • Soilborne pathogens cause seedling, vascular, and root rot diseases. Typical diseases result in visible lesions, rots, and wilts. Plant pathogens include fungi, oomycetes, nematodes, and viruses.
    • Soilborne pathogens are specific to certain crop species and are generally rare in natural, unmanaged systems.
    • Pathogens are not uniformly distributed through the soil profile and exist in microhabitats. This means the existence of a pathogen in soil does not necessarily mean plant disease will occur. However, higher loadings of pathogens in soil increase the likelihood of infected plants.
    • Soilborne plant diseases are most severe when conditions are poor (e.g., inadequate drainage, poor soil structure, low organic matter, high compaction). Their presence is not only influenced by inherent soil properties, but also by climate and agricultural management.
    • Pathogen survival in soil is tied to their ability to form vegetative structures that can survive for long periods. When environmental conditions are suitable, and a pathogen compatible host is present, vegetative structures germinate and penetrate below ground plant organs. After the death of the plant from disease or agronomic termination, “resting” pathogens contained in plant residues are returned to the soil surface.

How Soil Health Management Practices May Help

    • Soil health management practices help alleviate poor conditions, therefore in general are perceived to reduce soilborne plant diseases.
    • Additions of composted materials hold promise for suppressing plant pathogens (~50% success rate); however, mechanisms for successful suppression remain unknown.
    • Conservation tillage leaves residue on the surface which breaks down at a slower rate than if incorporated during tillage events. This can allow pathogens to survive in the residues for extended periods. However, most problems identified with conservation tillage were observed in monoculture systems. Increases in plant disease are generally not found in reduced tillage systems with diverse cropping rotations and/or the use of cover crops.
    • Crop rotations can break up the host-pathogen cycle. Any crop species that is not a host to the same pathogens can be useful in reducing pathogen loading in soils. However, some pathogens can survive for multiple years in the soil prior to infecting a host plant.
    • The use of cover crops can help suppress pathogens. For example, crops in the brassica plant family (broccoli, turnip, radish, canola, rapeseed, and mustards) produce compounds that break down into volatile toxins that can suppress soilborne pathogens.

Take Away

In terms of soil health management studies, disease suppression is commonly measured as disease reduction in the crop based on the implementation of soil health management practices. However, no soil health management practice consistently suppresses disease.

Pathogens are generally contained in low concentrations in soil, making direct quantification difficult. Recent advances in genomics provide finer details of pathogen loading and activity in soil. The incorporation of genomic techniques aims to predict disease rates based on genomic measurements of pathogens in soil.

Soil Health Institute to collaborate with Truterra on TruCarbon™

Soil Health Institute to collaborate with Truterra on TruCarbon™ metrics and soil sampling protocols

The Soil Health Institute (SHI), the global non-profit charged with safeguarding and enhancing the vitality and productivity of soils, is collaborating with Truterra as the scientific partner for soil metrics and sampling design for TruCarbon, the first farmer-owned carbon program in the U.S.

TruCarbon is a transformational new carbon program that will help farmers generate and sell carbon credits to private sector buyers. For the initial launch, SHI will develop the soil sampling design and methodologies for qualifying farmers to be compensated for the carbon they have sequestered retroactively, over the last five years, by adopting soil health practices in prior growing seasons.

Microsoft is the first secured buyer that will purchase the vintage carbon credits toward its ambitious commitment to be carbon negative by 2030.

“TruCarbon is like no other offering on the market because it is built with the farmer at the center, backed by the most cutting-edge technology platform on the market. That means that companies and others looking to buy trusted carbon credits can connect with farmers and support the adoption of more sustainable practices on farms across the country,” said Jason Weller, Vice President, Truterra. “We are excited to be able to bring this program to farmers through our trusted network of ag retailers, offering a competitive price and streamlined experience so that they can stay focused on farming and their stewardship.”

The earth is warming due to excessive amounts of greenhouse gases being released in the atmosphere, such as carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and methane. An important opportunity for addressing this issue is to sequester more carbon in soils, and scientists at SHI are publishing peer-reviewed studies showing that soil health systems are very effective at doing this.

“The science is clear,” said Dr. Wayne Honeycutt, CEO of the Soil Health Institute, “Storing more carbon in soils not only benefits a farmer’s bottom line, but also improves water quality and helps fight climate change. Farmers who adopt soil health practices build drought resilience, reduce erosion and minimize nutrient losses. All of us at the Soil Health Institute are excited to work with Truterra on this project because it will help achieve these on-farm and environmental benefits at scale.”

The Soil Health Institute will provide technical assistance to support the soil sampling strategy and design, field and laboratory methodologies, data analysis and quantification of the carbon sequestered in soils by participating farmers.

Interested farmers can find out more about the program and enroll at

About the Soil Health Institute
The Soil Health Institute is a global non-profit with a mission to safeguard and enhance the vitality and productivity of soil through scientific research and advancement. We bring together leaders in soil health science and the industry to help farmers, ranchers and landowners adopt soil health systems that build in drought resiliency, stabilize yields and benefit their bottom line.

The Institute’s team of scientists, holding doctorates in various soil science and related disciplines, has developed highly effective soil health targets and standardized measurements to quantify progress at achieving regenerative and sustainable agricultural systems, and leads the cutting-edge fields of carbon sequestration and decoding the soil microbiome.

Healthy soils are the foundation for rejuvenating our land. Together, we can create a secure future for all, mitigate the effects of climate change, and help agriculture and organizations meet production and environmental goals at scale.

Visit to learn more and follow us on LinkedInTwitter and Facebook.

About Truterra, LLC
Truterra is a leading stewardship solutions provider, advancing and connecting sustainability efforts throughout the food system with scale – from farmers to ag retailers to collaborators such as food companies. Truterra positions farmers for success by providing them tools and resources to establish a stewardship baseline and track progress on every field they farm. The Truterra™ network brings together the best in agricultural technology and on-farm business management to drive sustainability across the food system, feeding people, safeguarding the planet and supporting farmer livelihoods. Truterra was launched in 2016 by Land O’Lakes, Inc., a member-owned cooperative that spans the spectrum from agricultural production to consumer foods.

See the news release

Partnering with the Soil Health Institute Benefits Agriculture and the Environment

Partnering with the Soil Health Institute

In the last 10 years, “soil health” has evolved from an obscure concept to a central tenet that is the foundation for regenerative and sustainable agriculture. The Soil Health Institute champions the agricultural practices and systems that will provide nutritious food for a growing population, arrest climate change, conserve and enhance natural resources, and support the individuals who will achieve these benefits for the rest of us – our world’s farmers.
As a leading voice in this evolution, the Soil Health Institute is fortunate to partner with hundreds of individuals and organizations to address key barriers to widescale adoption of soil health systems. The Institute’s recent and forthcoming advances include:

    • Providing a comprehensive strategy for advancing soil health
    • Performing economic assessments of soil health systems on 125 farms
    • Identifying the most effective soil health measurements for everyone to use across North America (and likely beyond)
    • Offering on-farm and classroom soil health training programs for farmers and their advisers
    • Creating new tools for building on-farm drought resilience
    • Establishing locally relevant soil health targets for benchmarking current status and measuring progress
    • Assessing the soil health impacts on greenhouse gas emissions at 90 sites in more than 30 states
    • Launching online databases with more than 13,000 soil health references, almost 300 state-level programs and policies, and over 40 resources for K-12 educational programs
    • Analyzing over 60 Farm Bill programs/provisions on soil health
    • Briefing Congress to promote well-informed policies
    • Conducting an assessment of soil health practice adoption across the U.S.
    • Producing the Living Soil documentary, available for free on YouTube, with accompanying lesson plans
    • Developing online resources for farmers and consumers on soil health practices, economics, ecosystem services, measurements, climate change, communications and others

Soil scientist

These programs and accomplishments have provided the Soil Health Institute with the knowledge, experience and capacity to offer a range of partnership opportunities for advancing the science and practicality of soil health, including:

  • Strategic planning and implementation on local to global scales
  • Soil health measurements to establish baselines and achievable soil health targets
  • Soil carbon measurement and interpretation that supports carbon markets
  • Soil health training for farmers, consultants, government and private field conservationists
  • On-farm economic assessments of locally relevant soil health systems
  • Environmental assessments of conservation practices ranging from greenhouse gas emissions to water quality
  • Providing evidence-based information for state and federal policies
  • Conducting basic to applied research and development, ranging from the soil microbiome to decision-support tools and apps for farmers
  • and many others


We invite agencies, businesses, farmers, and other interested parties to reach out today to explore how the Soil Health Institute can help integrate soil health into your agricultural and environmental goals.  Please contact us here

Cotton Farmer Showcase

Eight informative discussions with farmers & specialists

The Soil Health Institute (SHI), the non-profit charged with safeguarding and enhancing the vitality and productivity of soils, invites you to join eight online discussions with U.S. cotton farmers and soil health experts who are improving soil health and evaluating its return on investment.

The Healthy Soils for Sustainable Cotton Farmer Showcase events will be livestreamed beginning 2 p.m. (EST), Tuesday, February 2, 2021 and run every Tuesday through March.  Cotton producers, consultants and other interested parties may register one time to participate in each showcase and receive notifications for each event. Registration is free but required to participate.

Learn more and register here.

Illuminating Discussions with Cotton Growers and Leaders on Improving Soil Health in Eight States


Episode 1 Date Speakers
Soil Health Challenges in the Delta: What Works and What Doesn’t February 2, 2021 Mr. Sledge Taylor, Farmer, Como, MS
Mr. Parker Frew, Delta F.A.R.M.


The Delta, with its fine-grained, dark soils and sometimes significant pressures from tough weeds such as Palmer amaranth or extreme weather such as a slow-moving hurricane, demands special skills from its cotton growers.

  • Improving internal soil drainage
  • Capturing more rainfall in the soil profile
  • Increasing soil organic matter
Episode 2 Date Speakers
Soil Health in Texas: Lessons from Long-term Study Sites February 9, 2021 Dr. Paul DeLaune, Texas AgriLife Professor Environmental Soil Science

Dr. Jamie Foster, Texas AgriLife Professor Forages

Dr. Katie Lewis, Texas AgriLife Associate Professor Soil Fertility and Chemistry


Dr. Murilo Maeda, Texas AgriLife Assistant Professor and Cotton Specialist

Dr. Jourdan Bell, Texas AgriLife Associate Professor and Extension Specialist

Mr. Jeremy Brown, Farmer, Lubbock, TX

Mr. Barry Evans, Farmer, Lubbock, TX


Dr. Emi Kimura, Assistant Professor, Texas AgriLife Agronomist and Extension State Peanut Specialist


Dr. Josh McGinty, Texas AgriLife Associate Professor and Extension Specialist


Explore the local challenges and benefits of adopting practices to improve soil health across Texas. Farmers’ experiences are compared to lessons from Texas A&M long-term study sites.

  • Managing cover crops to minimize water use
  • Improving soil moisture levels
  • Increasing soil organic matter levels
Episode 3 Date Speakers
Soil Health in Arkansas: Is it Profitable? February 16, 2021 Dr. Bill Robertson, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture Cooperative Extension Cotton Agronomist

Mr. Matt Fryer, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture Cooperative Extension Soil Instructor

Mr. Adam Chappell, Farmer, Cotton Plant, AR

Mr. Jess Flye, Farmer, Trumann, AR

Mr. Wes Kirkpatrick, Farmer, Dumas, AR


Three cotton producers with different levels of experience related to soil health practices and activities – as well as different views about tillage and cover crops – discuss growing cotton and farming for soil health in Arkansas. This webinar dives into economic data as well.

  • Addressing resistant Palmer pigweed pressures
  • Improving water infiltration
  • Reducing crusting
  • Reducing expenses for profitability
Episode 4 Date Speakers
Improving Soil Health in a Dry Climate February 23, 2021 Dr. Jeff Mitchell, University of California, Davis

Mr. John Teixeira, Farmer, Firebaugh, CA

Mr. Gary Martin, Farmer, Mendota, CA

Mr. Cary Crum, California Ag Solutions Crop Consultant, Madera, CA


Growers in a dry climate face specific cotton production challenges as they manage for moisture and overcome low organic matter, especially if they strive to build ecologically sensitive farming systems. California producers and soil health experts evaluate the best practices that hold promise in the state.

  • Managing cover crops in an organic system
  • Using soil amendments to improve soil (poultry and compost)
Episode 5 Date Speakers
Soil Health in a Cotton and Peanut Rotation March 2, 2021 Mr. Peyton Sapp, University of Georgia, Burke County Extension Coordinator

Mr. Burton Heatwole, Farmer, Millen, GA


When cotton growers rotate with peanuts, they obviously navigate a less-traveled journey toward improved soil health, focusing on strategic crop rotation, best timing of cover crops, and balanced nutrient uptake. In this episode of Healthy Soils for Sustainable Cotton Farmer Showcase, Georgia growers discuss practices that work well in their efforts to enhance long-term sustainability.

  • Increasing soil organic matter
  • Assessing benefits of multi-species cover crops
  • Capturing more rainfall in the soil profile


Episode 6 Date Speakers
Soil Health: View from the Cotton Gin March 9, 2021 Mr. Robbie Waters, Edwards Cotton Company, Scotland Neck, NC

Mr. Zeb Winslow, Farmer, Scotland Neck, NC


When you’ve evaluated cotton bales for years and built relationships with area cotton producers, you’re bound to have insight into which production practices pay year-after-year. In this episode, we ask a local cotton ginner to share his perspective of soil health benefits for the area’s cotton producers. Then, we talk with a local producer about his experiences, especially focusing on cover crop seeding and termination.

  • Does improving soil health impact cotton quality?
  • Planting and terminating cover crops to reduce cost and maximize benefits
Episode 7 Date Speakers
Lessons from 8 Years of Regenerative Agriculture March 16, 2021 Dr. Buz Kloot, Research Associate Professor, University of South Carolina

Mr. Doug Newton, Farmer, Clio, SC

Mr. Jason Carter, Farmer, Eastover, SC


After multiple years of experimentation and learning from their cotton fields, these producers discuss how to maximize the impact of soil health promoting practices on their Coastal Plain soils.

  • Improving a degraded nutrient cycle
  • Increasing soil organic matter
  • Reducing resistant weed pressure
Episode 8 Date Speakers
Why Soil Health is Important to the Future of U.S. Cotton March 23, 2021 Regenerative Agriculture Leaders:

Dr. Wayne Honeycutt, Soil Health Institute

Mr. Greg Bohrer,

Dr. Jesse Daystar, Cotton Incorporated



This conversation asks important questions of key regenerative agriculture leaders:

  • Why are companies becoming so interested in soil health?
  • Do data support that consumers are demanding regenerative practices? Are they willing to pay more for them?
  • Will soil health and regenerative agriculture practices be mandatory in the future?
  • Will growers see any financial reimbursements or incentives?

The Healthy Soils for Sustainable Cotton Farmer Showcase is part of the Healthy Soils for Sustainable Cotton project, which provides farmer-focused education and training events delivered by Soil Health Institute scientists, partnering with local soil health technical specialists and farmer mentors who have implemented successful soil health management systems. The project aims to increase the adoption of soil health management systems among cotton producers while documenting environmental and economic benefits.

Healthy Soils for Sustainable Cotton is supported through the generosity of the Wrangler® brand, the VF Corporation Foundation and the Walmart Foundation. For more information about the project, visit  To register and learn more about the virtual Farmer Showcase events, visit

See the news release.

Addressing change and challenge in manure applications

2020 certainly brought a lot of change and challenge for agriculture producers. While the pandemic forced Discovery Farms Programs in Wisconsin and Minnesota to cancel the annual conference, farmers, soil conservationists and crop consultants were still able to take advantage of educational opportunities online.

The theme for this year’s Discovery Farms’ weekly virtual conference series is “Keeping up with your conservation goals through change and challenge.”

A recent conference featured Dr. Christine Morgan of the Soil Health Institute in North Carolina who described soil health as the capacity of soil to function as a vital living ecosystem sustaining plants and animals. She notes that there are very different soils in different parts of the country or even within a state. However, that doesn’t mean they can’t all be healthy and productive.

As part of her work at the institute, she and colleagues have examined 124 samples across the country demonstrating different soil and practices.

“To measure this we look at how each part of soil health was affected by various management systems: rotation diversity, crop count, organic amendments (manure), cover crops, decreased tillage; and residue retention,” she said.

Read the full story here:

Two Novel Measurements Detect Differences in Soil Health Management Systems

The Soil Health Institute (SHI) announces a recent publication authored by SHI’s Chief Scientific Officer, Dr. Cristine Morgan, and Research Soil Scientist, Dr. Dianna Bagnall, is now available, open source, in Soil and Tillage Research.

The study, entitled “SLAKES and 3D Scans characterize management effects on soil structure in farm fields,” investigated the impact of no-till on soil structure and hydraulic function in the Lower and Middle Brazos River Watershed of Texas using measurements of saturated hydraulic conductivity, organic carbon, bulk density, slaking index of soil aggregates (inversely related to aggregate stability), and soil structure. The research was conducted in farm fields under three management systems: conventional tillage, no-till, and perennial grass. Soil structure was measured using multistripe laser triangulation, a novel method for 3D scanning of soil surface horizons. Slaking index was measured using a recently developed smartphone application called SLAKES.

No-till adoption shifted the soil health of row crop farm fields to be more like that of perennial grass fields. Organic carbon was significantly higher in no-till compared to conventionally tilled fields and hydraulic conductivity was 1.3 cm h-1 higher in no-till. As well, soil structure measured from 10 to 30 cm depth was significantly improved in no-till compared to conventional tillage. Improvements in organic carbon and soil hydraulic function are meaningful indicators of improved soil health and can also provide ecosystem services to off-site stakeholders. The two novel measurements (3D scanning of soil structure and slaking index from a smartphone application) were particularly able to detect differences between management systems.

Access the publication now through

Fall Newsletter 2020

The Soil Health Institute (SHI) has released its Fall Soil Health News, showcasing forward momentum on soil health adoption and research. The issue shares highlights from SHI’s 5th Annual Meeting with links to the conference sessions, conference report and video poster sessions.

The newsletter’s articles include:

  • How Soil Health Can Achieve Net Zero Carbon Emissions for U.S. Agriculture
  • “Assessing Soil Health” Webinar Series Delivers Information on Measuring and Assessing Soil Health
  • SHI Awarded $3.25 Million from ARPA-E to Develop Soil Carbon Measurement and Monitoring System
  • The Business Case for Adopting Soil Health Management Systems – A Project Update
  • NAPESHM UPDATE: Progress on Identifying Most Effective Measurements
  • Virtual Field Days Focus on Soil Health Promoting Practices in Cotton
  • Healthy Soils for Sustainable Cotton Named Field to Market Spotlight Honoree
  • Cotton & Covers: Farmers Share Their Soil Health Journey
  • Cristine Morgan, SHI Chief Scientific Officer, Named Soil Science of America Fellow

SHI also announces its new Scientific Advisory Committee.

Read the newsletter here.

ESMC November Newsletter

Executive Director Update

The sheer volume of recent activity that impacts ESMC’s work and that of our members and stakeholders seems to increase every month. Political change aside (for the moment), we’ve seen more and more companies and sectors in and outside the food and beverage sector taking on new goals and commitments to become more sustainable, including pledges to be net zero emitters of carbon and GHG by certain dates. Goal setting and reporting commitments are fantastic to see; they signal that the private sector is continuing to step up to address not just climate change, but associated natural resource and ecological impacts, including water resource constraints, biodiversity impacts, and related concerns that are critical to human and planetary health and food security. Concerns that the global COVID pandemic might reduce commitments or reduce resolve are calmed by the doubling-down of corporate actors that are evident in headlines everywhere, every day.

Valid concerns that society and consumers need to have transparency and clarity into the true impacts of these commitments and endeavors are also increasing. ESMC’s industry-wide approach ensures that sustainability and climate change mitigation activities in the agricultural sector are appropriately and rigorously quantified, verified, and certified by independent authorities. ESMC’s mission of scaling beneficial impacts that benefit society is centered in a voluntary, private market that meets multiple demand-side and buyer needs, while paying the farmers and ranchers whose actions create the impacts. Our program ensures that corporate actors in the agricultural supply chain and value chain need not make these investments individually; and that farmers and ranchers have the necessary tools and opportunities to participate without unduly burdening them. To de-risk these markets, we are ensuring that all market actors have the necessary tools to participate and are testing the entire program with all of them.

ESMC’s programmatic investments in technologically advanced protocols, tools, technologies and a monitoring, reporting, and verification platform have and will continue to establish a credible, durable system that meets market standards, buyer and investor needs, and can track and reward the impacts appropriately. The importance of having a robust and national scale infrastructure that ensures transparent, rigorous outcomes-based, certified tracking of impacts from agriculture cannot be overstated. We need change now, but the changes and the tracking must be durable, and the system must adapt to changing science, technology, and market standards. That flexibility of design is an underpinning of our approach. Where we will be in 5 years is not where we are now.

Recent political changes promise to bring additional opportunities to this space, and ESMC looks forward to engaging as these changes are further discussed and shaped. Additional support to the significant investments the private sector has made in this space, as well as to the public and private investments that ESMC and our members have collectively made is always welcomed, particularly in a manner that does not undermine or erode private voluntary markets which have the potential to scale ecological outcomes alongside traditional conservation programs. Both are necessary, and both must continue to scale impact and outcomes with necessary speed.

Thanks again to our members, stakeholders, collaborators, funders, and supporters for all the work that you do. We are honored to work with you, alongside you, and for you in what continues to be an inspiring and rewarding journey.

Read the full release here: